Rules on serviceĬivil Procedure Rule 6.3(1) sets out the permitted methods for service of a claim form. Cuciurean’s argument that he had not been served with or had proper notice of the order and was therefore not subject to its terms. Cuciurean, a protestor against the High Speed 2 (HS2) rail expansion project, was given a suspended prison sentence for trespassing on land in breach of an order that HS2 had previously obtained against ‘persons unknown.’ The court dismissed Mr. The case applied a recent Court of Appeal decision, Canada Goose v Persons Unknown EWHC 2459 (QB). The High Court has delivered guidance on how injunctions obtained against ‘persons unknown’ should be served in a decision in the case of Secretary of State for Transport (HS2) v Cuciurean EWHC 2614.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |